The highway does not have to be completely closed for construction
because the new highway is being built on a new alignment several
blocks south of the existing Crosstown. This allows for less interruptions
for drivers. Once traffic is put on the new highway, drivers should
expect temporary lane shifts near May Ave. and Lincoln Blvd. (Both
ends of the corridor) as construction continues in order to complete
tie-ins.
A lot has been done to preserve cultural and historical resources
during the environmental clearance process by working closely with
the Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees. These Committees
were involved in all aspects of the decisions regarding the project.
As indicated elsewhere on this site, there were representatives
on the Committees from the numerous groups, including the Riverside
Neighborhood, the Latino Community Development Agency and the Little
Flower Church. The environmental process identified resources within
the alignment that required special consideration. For instance,
within the Final Environmental Impact Statement there were 14 structures
identified as being of a historic nature in this corridor. Measures
were taken to appropriately photograph and document these properties.
Assuming full funding and no significant delays beyond our
control, construction is expected to be sufficiently complete for
traffic to be placed on the new interstate in 2012.
This is a common misconception. Construction of the new Crosstown
is not destroying Union station.
In fact, there are currently two active rail lines located just
south of the Union Station. The remainder of the former Union Station
yard is currently unusable due to the fact that the railroad companies
have removed many of the tracks and any other remaining tracks are
unserviceable.
The northernmost of the two active lines is operated by the Union
Pacific (UP). This line will be depressed, along with the roadway,
from approximately Santa Fe Ave. to approximately Western Ave. and
maintain somewhat the current alignment. The UP line will be far
enough to the south to allow for a second track to be installed
in the future in the event that passenger rail activities ever return
to Union Station.
Just to the south of the UP line is an east-west line belonging
to the BNSF Railroad. This line will be removed and the trains diverted
to the south of the North Canadian River onto an existing east-west
line referred to as the Packingtown Lead, which ODOT is updating.
Utilization of this line and the existing north-south BNSF mainline
in conjunction with improvements to the Flynn Yard will ensure continued
service for the area. This work will improve the connectivity from
the area of Will Rogers World Airport to the Santa Fe Station, which
is the chosen Oklahoma City passenger rail facility.
It should be noted that as a result of this project, ultimately,
at-grade railroad crossings are being eliminated at the following
locations: UP at Byers Ave., BNSF at Santa Fe Ave., UP at Santa
Fe Ave., UP at Shartel Ave., BNSF at Shartel Ave., UP at SW 7th,
UP at Western Ave., BNSF at Western Ave. (near SW 7th), BNSF at
McKinley, and UP at Pennsylvania Ave. Additionally, train traffic
will be greatly reduced at the following BNSF crossings: SW 15th,
Sulzberger Ave. and Indiana Ave. Existing BNSF rail crossings on
the Packingtown Lead near SW 20th are being updated and improved
with crossing signals and gates: Robinson Ave., Walker Ave., Western
Ave., McKinley, Kentucky, Pennsylvania Ave. and Agnew. These changes
will all reduce the chances for vehicle-train interaction and increase
public safety.
The situations of the two metropolitan areas vary by a substantial
amount. The 2000 census shows a population density of 255.1 persons
per square mile in Oklahoma City, and a population density of 573.6
persons per square mile in Dallas. Congestion within the Dallas
metropolitan area is significantly higher than that experienced
in Oklahoma City. A fixed guideway - rail - transit system works
in areas of high demand with a localized destination areas, such
as concentrated business districts. Oklahoma City has avoided having
a high concentration by allowing growth to occur across the city.
Some proponents of the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) system
claim that it has a daily ridership of up to 43,000 per day. If
the ridership for Oklahoma City would be similar in regards to population,
then the system would carry 8,921 per day. Today, the I-40 Crosstown
Expressway carries an annual average daily traffic of 119,600. Even
if each of those almost 9,000 riders came from traffic utilizing
the Crosstown, the facility would still be carrying in excess of
110,000 vehicles per day. That facility was designed to carry 76,000
per day.
While the disposition of the Union Station is not within the
jurisdiction of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, please
know that ODOT is giving considerations for rail transit. There
have been numerous studies completed regarding that issue [1992
Oklahoma Fixed Guideway Transportation Study, the 1995 Central Oklahoma
Transportation and Parking Authority (COTPA) major investment study
of transit corridor linkages entitled “The Link”, the
COTPA 2001 Long Range Transit Plan, the 2025 Oklahoma City Area
Regional Transportation Study Plan, the January 2002 revised version
of the 2001 High Speed Passenger Rail Feasibility Study and the
2002 Oklahoma High-Speed Rail Initiative - Oklahoma City to Tulsa
High-Speed Rail Corridor Cost Study], and there are no current plans
or recommendations for the use of Union Station as a passenger rail
facility.
Currently, the passenger rail facility serving Oklahoma City
is the Santa Fe Station located adjacent to downtown and Bricktown
on the BNSF mainline just three blocks east and six blocks north
of Union Station. However, the I-40 project is being designed with
sufficient room for a second track to be installed next to Union
Station at some point in the future if passenger rail service is
ever returned to Union Station.
The environmental clearance process studied that question in-depth.
There are several significant problems with attempting to rebuild
the Crosstown where it is. The existing interstate alignment is
experiencing a great deal of nearby expansion and development. With
the proximity of a number of features such as Ford Center on the
north and the OG&E facilities on the south, there is not room
for widening of the existing corridor to accommodate the necessary
capacity.
Also, a reconstruction of the Crosstown would take far longer
to complete than building a new roadway. Work would have to be done
in several phases, and would really inconvenience traffic along
this corridor. By building a new roadway, construction will be able
to proceed at a faster pace and cause fewer traffic delays, and
be the best use of taxpayer funds.